Comment on July 14th, 2006.
Completely agree. I believe I’m seeing varying qualities in the paper used in Moleskines. None have ever come close to the Miquelrius notebooks. Their lack of bleed-through and smoothness is excellent. The moleskines tend to feather for me, and the bleedthrough with a wet-nib is quite bad. What’s funny as hell is that Hemingway most certainly used fountain-pens. There’s no way this paper would have been acceptable to the FP users of the day.
In my studies last semester, I was a TA, it was really interesting to grade papers with my Fox Red noodler’s ink (Pelikan Red before Fox came out). The different types of paper were really really noticeable. Nothing like grading 54 papers to catch the wide range of problems. Some feathered horribly.
I kinda wished that Miquelrius had made Moleskines with soft-covers. That would be a notebook you could truly put in your backpocket with FP friendly paper! Their smaller 3×5′s are almost a good size for this, but they’re quite thick. I’m completely sold on Miquelrius after at least a year of daily Moleskine use.
Very glad to see you deal with this issue- Moleskines are definitely nice looking books, and if you’re using a pasty roller-ball, you’re in good… but the moment you go to real ink, you’ll see the difference immediately. I wished they cared about these types of things, but it’s painfully obvious that ModoEModo doesn’t.
Comment on July 21st, 2006.
I have not experience this at all. I have use my Waterman Philieas (with the included ink), refilled that with some Parker Quink black, then filled with Noodler’s Luxury Blue, and now with a Lamy Safari with the included ink – all in all I am pleased with the way the ink is handled.
I will say this though, the quality of the molekines is getting a little worse each time I check them out.
Comments can contain some xhtml. Names and emails are required (emails aren't displayed), url's are optional.